Talk:Until We Have Faces

Track listing

There no need to have the exclusive bonus track separated. There's note to indicate that it's an iTunes-exclusive track and there's even a reference to that. To have it as a collapsed, separated track listing doesn't benefit the reader. Please explain why it should exist. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Name Inspiration

On their website RED talks about C.S. Lewis as an inspiration, but I've yet to find any reference to taking the album's name from his novel. If there are no objections, I'll give the author a month to come up with a source for that claim. After that, I think it's best to remove it as heresay. Statarius (talk) http://redmusiconline.com/about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Statarius (talk • contribs) 03:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Might want to check out this interview site when you get a chance...states pretty clearly the novel's influence on the album. http://copiousnotes.bloginky.com/2011/03/11/red-hot-at-winter-jam/#more-8957 Bnhwillard (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Personnel/Reception

I believe these sections (Personal and Reception) need to be edited heavily and shortened. At the present moment they are too long and the reader will get lost looking at them. Having sections that long are just filler and need to be more concisely written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:2539:3709:3d61:67db:9807:4a8e (talk • contribs) 05:20, 13 01 2013 (UTC)

What do you propose to remove from the reception section? I suppose non-notable review sites could be removed, alternately, reducing the space given to each review or combining them would help. However, they're all fairly brief already.

As for the personnel section, again what would you suggest removing? I think it's perfectly fine the way it is since it lists the personnel involved in recording the album.

Both sections are standard and acceptable for any album article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Single notability

All of the singles after "Faceless" and "Feed the Machine" are only notable because they charted. They consist of two sentences, a tracklist, and a chart. Being very short pages, I'm suggesting redirecting those ones to the album. I'd like to hear what everyone thinks. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Over a month and nobody has said anything. I have noticed these articles were created by a devious and now-blocked sockpuppeteer who used to genre war and just plain write false info and create single pages for those which had no right to have individual articles. All these pages remain short except "Lie to Me," and I'm redirecting the rest, as they have been stubs for nine months. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)