Talk:Untitled (Hodgy Beats EP)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "Lyrically the record features lyrics about self-refection" - How about "Lyrically the record deals with..." or similar, to avoid repetition

   "The EP was announced on Hodgy Beats' official Twitter account on February 20 2012 " - comma missing

   "It features no production from Odd Future producers," - how about "Unlike in the previous records (if that is true), Odd Future did not contribute in the production" or "Odd Future did not play a role in the production"

   Why is "Plies" in italics?

All corrected.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Source of the file: Page not found--Kürbis (✔) 11:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Corrected

1. Overall: Hold--Kürbis (✔) 16:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail:

I believe your concerns have been corrected properly. Bruce Campbell (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I will pass, congrats! Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 20:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)