Talk:Up! Close and Personal/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Toa Nidhiki05 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs · count) 00:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Concerns/Notes

  • The source used for the line "Krauss later expressed her opposing views, saying she would have personally kept the original lyrics, although she respected Twain's decision." is correct aside from the last bit - nowhere in the source does she say she respected the decision.
  • Done.
  • I would suggest also including an image from the DVD, to add a more visual appeal to the article. This is not a concern, and will not factor into my decision.

Other than that, the article fits criteria. If you can fix this one issue, I'd be willing to pass this article. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Alright, great job with the changes. Passed. :) Toa Nidhiki05 18:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply