Talk:Uproar Festival
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uproar Festival article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Avenged Sevenfold drummer
editWhy is it not notable to mention a tour-exclusive fill-in drummer? Fezmar9 (talk) 02:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
The statement that this will be the first time A7X will be on tour since The Rev died is false. The citations also do not lead to anything that states this. I have seen Avenged Sevenfold on tour since The Rev died in Feb. of 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.42.219.220 (talk) 03:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Split sections into one new article for each year of the tour?
editSplit - Article is long, and should be split into one new article for each year of the tour. Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Should pages for Guttermouth discography and Uproar Festival 2010 (along with other years) be created?
editShould pages for Guttermouth discography, Uproar Festival 2010, Uproar Festival 2011, Uproar Festival 2012, Uproar Festival 2013 be created? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Some of these topics don't currently have a lot (or any) references associated with them. Adding a bunch more Wikipedia articles with little to no citations really isn't that great an idea IMO. If someone could find some more references for these topics, then great. Good luck... Guy1890 (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Agree with Guy. Not a lot of references as it is, so I would not recommend a split at this time unless reliable sources for each individual event can be found to develop each article. Use WP:CONCERT as a guide. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with the comments above, creating articles with trivial sources is not helpful, I think Content fork talks specifically about this kind of issue. The parent article should be expanded and developed containing its future cfork, when the sections reachs maturity it should be separated from its parent article, so, right now all of these suggestions are not ready to have their own article. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 11:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)