Talk:Uranium market

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Added list of major countries enriching uranium. (source: http://www.uic.com.au/nip33.htm) --NCB 15:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

NYMEX News

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Would it be proper to update the page to reflect the addition of a NYMEX Financial-settled Uranium futures market?

http://nymex.com/press_releas.aspx?id=pr20070416a

Rraicu 09:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quote: "This technologically complicated and challenging process is simple in comparison to the complexity of the market that has evolved to provide these three services."

I would say this is like comparing apples and oranges. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.114.97.127 (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can somone do a apples to apples comparison between a) the amount of energy inputs to enrich low grade yellowcake into a kilo of 4% U235 v/s

b) the amount of Net electrical energy delivered out of the generator; after taking plant losses into account, when spending one kilo of the above 4% U235 in a normal pressurized heavy water reactor ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.95.167.91 (talk) 10:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Misrepresentation

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In section Available supply physicist Bernard Cohen is misquoted. Bernard Cohen explains the usage of nuclear fuel, not the available uranium sources. The source usage is very POV and the text pretty irrelevant for the article. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 16:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic