Talk:Urban East Norwegian

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Received Pronunciation"

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Norwegian doesn't have any kind of "Received Pronunciation" and has never had anything that has academically been referred to as such. Most of this article should be either rewritten or reworded to remove this phrase. I know that one technically doesn't "speak" bokmål, but I assume the original author was trying to say spoken bokmål rather than RP. I'd assume this ties in with the general lack of citation in the article.

--139.166.168.19 (talk) 11:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have removed unsourced/dubious claims, including the references to UEN as a Received Pronunciation. The section still, however, possibily violates WP:UNDUE. If you find any sources supporting opposing viewpoints, feel free to ping me or add them yourself. Profzed (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Update: I deleted the "hirearchy" section since it is not actually relevant to UBE (or rather, it makes no mention of UBE though I can see a link). Thus, there is no longer WP:UNDUE weight. Profzed (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic