Talk:Urban Vocal Group
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Legacypac in topic Review of Draft:Urban Vocal Group
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review of Draft:Urban Vocal Group
editHi Legacypac!
I revisited the Draft:Urban Vocal Group page that you reviewed, and I'd like to thank you for your review. I have acknowledged your statement and have restructured the article to respect the golden rule. The information is presented in a more neutral point of view, along with multiple references to primary and secondary sources, which can be found on the article with appropriate citations.
I hope you read this and I apologise for discussing this here (since I'm a complete noob to wikipedia-ing) I didn't see any other method of highlighting the changes I have made other than through you.
Thanks you for your time, Legacypac
Best Regards, McKane4 (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- This is a fine place, or post to the article talk page where I've copied your note. Legacypac (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)