Talk:Urfa Sanjak
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 11 June 2024
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 June 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 10:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Urfa sanjak → Urfa Sanjak – Consistent with other articles on Ottoman sanjaks. See articles within Category:Sanjaks of the Ottoman Empire. Scholarship uses both lowercase and uppercase letters and actually appears to favor uppercase more. Aintabli (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 00:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Turkey and WikiProject Syria have been notified of this discussion. Векочел (talk) 11:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Ottoman Empire and WikiProject Former countries have been notified of this discussion. Векочел (talk) 11:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- This should be simply moved at this point. Nobody is contesting it. It's an uncontroversial proposal. Killuminator (talk) 14:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Killuminator, I can't move it myself, and if I were to post this at WP:RM/TR, it would probably be rejected as potentially controversial given this article has been moved before. Should I take your comment as a support vote? Aintabli (talk) 08:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I support moving the article. Killuminator (talk) 08:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Killuminator, I can't move it myself, and if I were to post this at WP:RM/TR, it would probably be rejected as potentially controversial given this article has been moved before. Should I take your comment as a support vote? Aintabli (talk) 08:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.