This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Preprints
edit@456RTD: Per {{Biorxiv}}, bioRxiv contains preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed and hence should be used with a high degree of caution. Per WP:MEDRS and WP:SCIRS, these reports should not be used to support medical or scientific claims.
Because an astonishingly high percentage of research cannot be repeated, ideal sources to support scientific claims are WP:secondary (review articles). But at a minimum, the sources should at least be peer reviewed. Boghog (talk) 07:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)