Talk:Utah State Route 101/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Imzadi1979 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Some minor MOS breaches with missing non-breaking spaces between numbers and units in measurements that were just fixed.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- A photo would be nice, but not required. The same goes for a map.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- The paragraph in the History section on the car accident isn't really needed, IMHO. You might want to remove since it isn't very notable. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: