This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment
editThis article does not have any sections aside from the junction list and references, therefore it is a stub. -- Kéiryn (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Still needs route description, but history, lead-in, and a photo have been added. Now merits start-class. DeFaultRyan (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Same rationale as above, unless I'm missing something. CL (T · C) — 23:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- The history is sure short - you sure that's all there is? --Rschen7754 00:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- For some reason, the highway resolutions page on UDOT's website doesn't list SR-261. It's pretty hard to get its history from another source mainly because that's usually the only source there is. Besides, it has a so-so lead and junction list, so I think this is still a step above a stub. CL (T · C) — 00:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- But I guess I'll add a brief route description. CL (T · C) — 00:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)