Talk:Uthman's Quran
Latest comment: 23 hours ago by Pogenplain in topic Requested move 29 November 2024
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of مصحف عثمان from the Arabic Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Requested move 29 November 2024
edit
It has been proposed in this section that Uthman's Quran be renamed and moved to Mushaf of Uthman. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Uthman's Quran → Mushaf of Uthman – I suggest this move because:
- As this article is about a codex (or mushaf) and it is consistent with other articles. (Mushaf of Ali and Mushaf of Aisha).
- Uthman Quran is a redirect to Samarkand Kufic Quran, an early manuscript (not a codex) and this title makes it very ambiguous for the reader. Please note that we also have Uthman Taha Quran (a modern-day calligraphy of Quran).
- Arabic Wikipedia (the native language of this book) has used this title.
- Scholarly sources do not use this title. 'Codex of Uthman' and 'Uthmanic codex' are common. If the word mushaf is obscure, I suggest the word codex to be used instead.
Best regards, Khánum Gül (talk) 09:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support "Uthmanic codex": On Google Scholar, it has by far the most hits, above "Codex of Uthman", "Mushaf of Uthman", "Uthman's Quran." ―Howard • 🌽33 15:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I also think Uthmanic codex make sense. Pogenplain (talk) 06:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)