Talk:Uzi Meshulam

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Yohananw in topic Bias, establishment one point view
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uzi Meshulam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bias, establishment one point view

edit

see the Hebrew wiki article on Rabbi Uzi Meshulum for more sides of the controversy besides abducted children, stolen books, etc. This English article has narrow establishment point of view. "...though the public protests eventually diminished", passed on to next generations is more likely.-Yohananw (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

.