Talk:V – The New Mythology Suite

Fair use rationale for Image:VThenewmythologysuitealbumcover.jpg

Image:VThenewmythologysuitealbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SymphonyXV.jpg

Image:SymphonyXV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Original research?

I just added an original research template to the Miscellaneous section, because I have found no reference of such claims anywhere on the Net, and they're likely to be a bunch of personal observations IMHO. What do you guys think? Emc² • contact me 18:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Technically, yeah, I guess it's minor, trivial OR, but what the hell. Nothing to make a fuss about. Of course, some niggling no-life spoilsports always disagree, even though there are far more relevant things to get worked up about on Wikipedia. Neutral, fact-based observations that are easy to verify by just looking at the darned thing and require virtually no personal interpretation (and are of interest only for a couple prognerds, so basically, nobody else freaking cares, anyway) are not exactly Wikipedia's most urgent problems. It's just a cool combination of coincidences. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Totally agree, but what ya gonna do. *shrug* WP's NOR policies are set in stone, and they really seem to loathe original research of the just-look-at-the-darned-thing variety with a passion. No room for a bit of fun. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)