definition or name?

edit

Definitions of this that are probably the name are going to need an entire new article, because the name one is a list of people with the name, IIRC.

However, it would be alright to redirect the name to a Sanskrit article. After all, Brahman redirects to a divine name. Nevertheless, people exist called Brahmananda, etc..

structure of the disambiguation

edit

I thought disambiguations are more like a list. The Sanskrit word should probably be in the list instead of as a definition as if it is not a disambiguation.--Dchmelik (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply