Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
edit- I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am not sure how folks feel about the 'notes' interspersed within the synopsis. I put them in because I thought they were useful, especially as Valaquenta is otherwise one of the more 'biblical' stories - along with the discussions of land and language, it can give some readers the 'leviticus-numbers' heebee jeebees. The notes seek to aid the reader in connecting Valaquenta and its contents with the larger, better known episodes of Middle-earth history. At any rate, I am interested to see what others think. Black Thorn of Brethil 13:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- For the most part, it's useful information, although it should be integrated more smoothly into the rest of the article. I'll see what I can do when I have more time. --DachannienTalkContrib 06:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)