Talk:Valentino (fashion house)

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Yogi Beara (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight. (UPE sockpuppet)

Founding Date

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When was the company actually founded since there are three dates provided: 1959, 1960 or 1965? --72.223.63.167 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, on the grounds that readers are best served by having separate pages; distinct scope. Uncontested objection with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 08:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I believe Valentino Ready-to-Wear runway collections should be merged into Valentino (fashion house) because the collections themselves are not independently notable outside of Valentino. If Valentino had subsections talking about each collection it would make much more sense. Most of these sources are reliable sources for that. Trillfendi (talk) 21:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Support. I am merging Christian Dior Ready-to-Wear runway collections for the same reason. 162 etc. (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I understand the instinct to merge, but many other designers have separate pages; one for their overall brand/house versus a separate one for their fashion shows/collections by season. Dior was unique in that it had very few show details to merge but others (take Chanel vs. Chanel RTW runway collections, for example) each have extensive content that might be best left separate.

We can think of this as the same way we separate many major tv show pages from separate pages dedicated to seasons and episodes of those series. They can still reference each other where appropriate, but I think they serve distinct purposes as two separate pages. Informationageuser (talk) 18:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic