Talk:Valery Legasov

Latest comment: 9 months ago by FredTheDeadHead in topic Disturbing report


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Valery Legasov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Death

edit

The sections "Chernobyl disaster" and "Circumstances of death" seem to contain a lot of overlapping information in them. Should these be cleaned into one section only? Also, this article is directly contradicting itself. The disaster section says that he was found hang in his office and the death section says that he hang himself in his apartment. I imagine both of these cannot be true at the same time.--Hamuko (talk) 16:52, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

They can both be true if we assume he has a home office and I would assume he did.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.243.250.47 (talk) 03:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm wondering why the article needs this uncited factoid: "The loop was tied professionally and with the help of a special cable used by climbers.[citation needed]" Is it really that important to mention the professionalism of his suicide? It sounds like someone implying that he may have been murdered; I don't know why else they would include that detail about the loop. 2601:445:380:5D00:A00B:B431:C1FC:8B6D (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disturbing report

edit

"The report ran to 388 pages and was presented by Legasov to the conference in a 5-hour presentation, which many in the audience found disturbing.[26]"

What was disturbing? The length of the report was too long? Or too short? Legasov presenting it? The duration was too short? Or too long? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredTheDeadHead (talkcontribs) 01:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply