Talk:Kingdom of Valluvanad

Should a page on Valluvanad focus purely on the historical context? How common is it, presently, to refer to Valluvanad as a region? If people are increasingly referring to Valluvanad as a region that they belong to (even without formal/legal/administrative backing), we may have to account for that somehow. This article's focus is presently almost entirely historical.

Orphaned references in Kingdom of Valluvanad

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Kingdom of Valluvanad's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Malabar":

• From Kerala: Sreedhara Menon, A. (2007). Kerala Charitram (2007 ed.). Kottayam: DC Books. ISBN 978-8126415885. Retrieved 19 July 2020.
• From Kozhikode: Menon, A. Sreedhara (2007). A Survey of Kerala History. DC Books. ISBN 9788126415786.
• From Nilambur: 1951 census handbook - Malabar district (PDF). Chennai: Government of Madras. 1953. p. 1.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)