Talk:Value Expectations

I changed things and deleted any content that may be considered questionable. If you believe it is still considered spam message me and I will do what i can to fix it. I think it should be ok now though.

Are there reliable, third-party sources that help establish notability of this blog? If there are, please provide them otherwise notability cannot be established. ArcAngel (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

References

References 3 & 4 provide third party sites in which Value Expectations has been featured on, especially RealClearMarkets. Also, Value Expectations frequently has articles featured on Google. FrankFlorez (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, those references you provided I cannot qualify as third-party, as they are still in the industry in which the blog operates. Google isn't a reliable source either as it is just a search engine. If you can find sources that are covered in some news category (such as CNN, USAToday, or even the local newspaper) those would qualify as reliable sources. Also, it is considered bad form to remove speedy deletion tags if you have created the article yourself - instead you need to place a hangon tag as explained in the CSD tag. ArcAngel (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I should have been more clear. I'm not saying Value Expectations shows up only on Google Search, I am saying the articles are featured on Goodle News. Also,we have credible references such as USNews.com and TheStreet.com, both of which I have added to the list of references. ,

Also, I don't understand how RealClearMarkets is not a credible third-party source. REALCLEAR is one news source that has RealClearPolitics, RealClearMarkets, RealClearWorld and RealClearSports. They are not only in the industry in which the blog operates it is a matter of that is the site they put the articles on. If we were a sports writing website they would feature our articles on RealClearSports; this is merely a matter of sorting, not credibility. FrankFlorez (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I would consider USNews and TheStreet reliable, but I am not sure about RealClear though, so I am going to get some clarification on that. ArcAngel (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but I believe that I have proved that this is not spam as well as proved it has enough significance to stay on Wikipedia and would appreciate you either removing the tag or I would like someone else to view this. If there are any other sources to post in the future I will do so. FrankFlorez (talk) 19:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

References