Talk:Vampire: The Masquerade – Redemption

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Darkwarriorblake in topic E3 award
Featured articleVampire: The Masquerade – Redemption is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 7, 2016.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2015Good article nomineeListed
October 15, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Untitled

edit

I was just looking at this game on Amazon.com and it seems pretty clear that there is a Mac version released by MacSoft. If someone comes along to corroborate this, please go ahead and make the change to the article. Decatur 16:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

this artical is horribly shaped, I think this is what you call wikistyle, or something like that. for example, the picture being below the "see also" section.

How about an actual list of the original design flaws that the article references? 77.114.12.23 (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Huebner is undefined in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.119.122.54 (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

"but were polarized by the quality of the story and combat" Who add this fail? The game history quality are caracterized to be one of the greatest of videogames, and deserv a movie for fans of video games — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.88.249.59 (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Useful sources

edit

GA Review

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vampire: The Masquerade – Redemption/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 21:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this on. Be back in a few days with review. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • I've had a thorough look at it, and it looks in splendid condition. Can't see anything that needs mentioning, or anything else that prevents this article from being an Instant Pass. This is well on the way towards becoming a featured article in my opinion. --ProtoDrake (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Bloody hell that was fast, thanks @ProtoDrake: Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 18:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

PC Player sales analysis

edit

Use of Gameranx

edit

@Darkwarriorblake: Just noticed that this article uses Gameranx as a source for a few statements, which is listed as an unreliable source on WP:VG/RS. I'm removing the bit about Redemption appearing on Gameranx's top vampire list, but we do need to replace it for the other uses.--AlexandraIDV 22:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

E3 award

edit

It's not "random" to place it first in the reception section since it's a award given before the game's release, before all the reviews were released. Mika1h (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, the reception is about the reception of the game, dropping a single sentence in there about awards is jarring, especially just dropped in at the start. The subsection doesn't harm anyone, it's literally been there since 2015 and it makes sense to be there. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 21:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply