Talk:Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 5, 2013.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union Mid‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this definitely Article 25?

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Because in the revised treaty it looks like it might be Article 28 ("Quantitive restrictions on imports and all measures having equivilant effect shall be prohibited between Member States") instead of Article 25 ("Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.")...

This is from the latest version of the treaty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.149.127.101 (talk) 23:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The case originally turned on Art. 12 EEC, which reads "Member States shall refrain from introducing between themselves any new customs duties on imports and exports or any charges having equivalent effect, and from increasing those which they already apply in their trade with each other.", so yes, that has now been replaced by Art. 25 EC. The Court held that the reclassification of urea-formaldehyde into a higher tarif category was equivalent to increasing a customs duty, and so illegal. Physchim62 (talk) 06:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I believe that the correct article now comes from the Treaty of Lisbon. Article 25 EC is now Article 30 in the Treaty on the Function of the European Union. Article 30 TFEU reads as follows: "Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.167.164.128 (talk) 15:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

My knowledge of the history is a bit sketchy as to when it happened, but wasn't the original article heading towards the free trade of goods between Member States - something that was achieved a while back, meaning that the original article is not really applicable now? 81.23.50.232 (talk) 10:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Legal Europe

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2024 and 15 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Swimmer504 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Swimmer504 (talk) 02:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic