This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Vance Hartke is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Sorry if my formatting skills aren't the best, but I was reading this article and something doesn't seem right. The section 'Indiana Political heroes' Author Geoff Paddock seems to be a word for word reprint of a book by said author. I haven't actually read the book, but it seems like the most likely scenario. In addition, there is no citation, and much of the text is already included earlier in the article. Actually, not that I look at it again, the sections that have the same material earlier in the article are also not cited. This looks like a section that should probably be eliminated, no? Or at least merged into the rest of the article and cited. I'm contemplating removing the entire section myself, if I don't see objections in the relatively near future (1 or 2 weeks). Tominrochester Tominrochester (talk) 11:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
That section heading may be gone, but much of this article still reads like it was lifted from a hagiography: largely adulatory tone and very few references. I know rather little about the man and his career, but there's quite a bit of work to be done here. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Last Democrat Besides a Member of the Birch Family to be Elected"?
