Talk:Vanderbilt Triple Palace/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Epicgenius in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 20:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this! — GhostRiver 20:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lede
edit- "was generally
negativelycriticized"
Design
editLayout and courtyard
edit- "Doors separated the three residences, but they could be opened to create a large event space." → "The doors separating the three residences could be opened to create a large event space."
Facade
edit- Misplaced period after "However, William Henry"
Features
edit- Add diacritics and WL on papier-mâché
- "W.H." → "W. H." per MOS:INITIAL (this shows up a few times)
History
edit19th century
edit- First sentence of Construction uses "lot" singular, whereas the second sentence uses "lots" plural
- "sixty European sculptors" → "60 European sculptors"
20th century
edit- "Among the buyers was" → "Among the buyers were" since you then go on to list two
Critical reception
edit- "was not reviewed positively," → "was received coldly"
References
edit- Good
General comments
edit- Earwig score looks good
- No stability concerns in the revision history
- Pictures are all public domain (except for one CC0) and relevant
Should be all quick fixes – putting on hold for now. — GhostRiver 21:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review @GhostRiver. I have done all of these. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.