This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'm having trouble understanding why a holding company for twelve large-market hospitals across the United States would not be considered ipso facto notable. In any event, I've added the additional information that the company is in the Fortune 1000. (I created this article following the redlink from MetroWest Medical Center, which is two of those twelve hospitals and has apparently already survived a deletion review once.) 121a001202:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Strictly speaking, a speedy deletion isn't about notability, but about the article not making claims to notability. At any rate, being in the Fortune 1000 is one of the arguable criterion. Speedy exits stage left. Coren02:42, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It appears from SEC filings that Vanguard is currently owned by a private-equity investor group led by Blackstone Group, but which includes significant minority holdings. I'm not sure how to describe that in the article, though. The easiest document to find the description of Vanguard's capital structure seems to be an S-4 registration statement from late 2004 (after the takeover). I did not research Vanguard's capital structure prior to going private. 121a001203:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
