Talk:Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello! I will begin reviewing this article as soon as possible!--Dom497 (talk) 00:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The quality of the article is good.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Please see below. Issues fixed.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Everything looks good for this section of the review.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   All statements have at least one reference.

   C. No original research:

   No original research found.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The article covers all major aspects of the topic.

   B. Focused:

   The article stays on topic.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias found.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article is stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   All images used in the article are tagged properly.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Images are used where possible.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Everything in the article is great. I just have 2 suggestions that should be taken into consideration before I pass the article.

• Under the athletic section of the article, above the table it says Mens, but there is a women event in the table. This needs to be fixed.
  • I removed the titles "Mens", and for consistency's sake, the "Womens" on the next event. It should be all set. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
• For reference #2, why isn't it in the "</ref>{{cite web|url=..." form? This should be fixed before I pass the article.
  • I formatted it without the Cite web format because when I set it up, the result (for some reason) refused to connect to the actual URL. Once I placed the actual reference in Cite web format. it ended up looking something like "[www.sportingpulse.com/get_file.cgi?id=591528 "2008 VASANOC Annual Report"]. Vanuatu Association of Sports and National Olympic Committee. 2008. Retrieved 26 April 2012." I could add in the retrieval date, however, which I seemed to have forgotten. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

--Dom497 (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for doing this review. I have addressed the first comment. Hopefully my answer to the second is sufficient, but let me know if there are alternate solutions to be had. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Weird...I tried fixing the problem using different formats for the reference on my sandbox but nothing worked...--Dom497 (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)