Talk:Vapor–liquid separator
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ziaddel in topic Grammar and usage, introduction
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vapor–liquid separator article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grammar and usage, introduction
editPlease correct the grammar and usage of this section:
"In low gravity environments such as a space station, a common liquid separator will not function because gravity is not usable as a separation mechanism. In this case, centrifugal force needs to be utilized in a spin"
1. Gravity is not a separation mechanism. It should say "because gravity is not usable as a driving force for a separator."
2. Centrifugal force has no needs. So we should not say that "centrifugal force needs this or that." There could be other technologies as well, so the last sentence would begin better as, "In this case, gravity is used in a spin..." Remember, KISS.
Ziaddel (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC) zeaddel 5IX2014