Talk:Varhaug
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editJune 1, 2007: Hi, I moved the former municipality Varhaug out of this article, because it's history and not what most people think of when they hear Varhaug. Old "Varhaug kommune" can be found at Varhaug Municipality. - User:Olaversterk
- Hi, your move was reverted. It was deeply problematic as it went against standards, conventions and consensus in the English Wikipedia - according to which a village and municipality with the same name should share the same article. Punkmorten 08:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh sorry about that. I just thought a former municipality has fairly little interest and importance for the village today. Also I thought the definition of a municipality is a settlement with local government. I think it shouldn't be treated the same. Because the municipality included more villages. By the way, do you have the old municipality article I wrote, I wan't to merge that one into the village article, I feel it was better structured and explaining. Olaversterk 11:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- I already merged it. If you want to improve the structure, feel free to do so at Varhaug. And yes, today villages and municipalities with the same name are covered in the same article. Punkmorten 08:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh sorry about that. I just thought a former municipality has fairly little interest and importance for the village today. Also I thought the definition of a municipality is a settlement with local government. I think it shouldn't be treated the same. Because the municipality included more villages. By the way, do you have the old municipality article I wrote, I wan't to merge that one into the village article, I feel it was better structured and explaining. Olaversterk 11:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Varhaug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113214350/http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/02/01/10/beftett_en/tab-2012-09-06-01-en.html to http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/02/01/10/beftett_en/tab-2012-09-06-01-en.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040614073527/http://eklima.met.no/ to http://eklima.met.no/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)