Talk:Varna Necropolis

Untitled

Starting page: to discuss date

100 archaeological discoveries (Ref)

The semi-comprehensive synopsis, ( 9 paragraphs, about 700 words ), starts the article by saying age is 4500-4000 BC.

A quote from the article(No. 34):

"...nearly 300 graves has produced an astonishing amount of gold artifacts, including diadems, body ornaments, and weapon shafts, as well as finely made objects of copper, flint, and stone. "..

Article also includes an In situ grave pic, and a pic of an organized, "laid-out" group of artefacts (+shell bead necklace?).MMcAnnis,YumaAZMmcannis 15:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

The KGKIV

"The local variant of the KGKIV:" I don't think one reader in five hundred has any idea of what this signifies; was such impressive mystification intended? I can guess this is a culture stratum, fourth in someone's series. Perhaps one of those Ks stands for Kalkolithic or Kulture... --Wetman (talk) 01:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

KGKVI refers to Gumelniţa–Karanovo_culture Kamenpenev (talk) 07:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

So? Should have linked to it, so that those (like us) who don't know what "KGKIVI" means can click on the link, and find out what it is! That's the whole point of links in Wikipedia, right? (I have now done so.) Noel (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Historical Impact

"The gold artifacts from the Varna Chalcolithic necropolis are assumed to be the “oldest gold of mankind” according to their total volume and quantity. " Does not make sense to me. It implies that the volume and quantity prove it is the oldest.

IceDragon64 (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Still a problem. 87.247.25.178 (talk) 08:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

See also links

I could not appopriately edit the See also section, which has at least 1 corrupted link, so I inserted the replacement, but it fell above the numbered list. Help, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anyaka (talk • contribs) 22:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Varna Necropolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120512003512/http://www.articlearchives.com/reports-reviews-sections/chronologies/545649-1.html to http://www.articlearchives.com/reports-reviews-sections/chronologies/545649-1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081212014030/http://www.omda.bg/ENGL/history/selishte1_engl.htm to http://www.omda.bg/engl/history/selishte1_engl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Age or Weight?

I don't understand the following sentance: "The gold artifacts from the Varna Chalcolithic necropolis are assumed to be the "oldest gold of mankind" according to their total volume and quantity" Surely the volume and quantity have nothing to do with whether it is the oldest? IceDragon64 (talk) 01:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

• • • OMG I have just discovered that I wrote this before in 2014 and I have no memory of having even visited this page before- frightening ! I wish I could fix this, but I don't know what they mean.

IceDragon64 (talk) 01:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

I believe the sentence is supposed to imply that this can be considered the oldest golden "treasure" - other finds may be equally old but due to limited diversity and or volume it's not clear if they constitute a treasure hoard or just individual items clumped together. Maybe something along the lines of "That being said, due to it's diversity and volume, Varna gold is usually considered the oldest man-made golden treasure." HallowDance (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)