Talk:Vatican leaks scandal
.svg)
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Vatican leaks scandal be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Vatican internal investigation
editSince this invesigation has presumably been concluded, now that Gabriele has been convicted, this section really should be reworded from the present tense to the past tense. Dick Kimball (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Bad puns
editWhere does the phrase 'the butler did it' come from? 93.97.45.17 (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently, at this point no one knows.[1] Jzsj (talk) 14:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/13993.html.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
Resignation
editAnd today, Pope Benedict resigns. First time a Pope has done this since 1294. One wonders if there is a connection to the Vatileaks scandal. W. B. Wilson (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- The last pope to resign was in 1415. :p--Ollyoxenfree (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Page name
editHey everyone, I was wondering what the general opinion would be on a change of this page name. While "Vatileaks" was certainly used, it seems from looking through coverage that it was probably not the definitive most common name, and that a name like "Vatican leaks scandal" was more commonly used and would be more descriptive and less informal. Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Vatican leaks scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120604001859/http://www.google.com:80/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hlIIJlaZhzmXG9T60ztbm9_nQcZw?docId=a75547d274094085aa0892c3c238d083 to http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hlIIJlaZhzmXG9T60ztbm9_nQcZw?docId=a75547d274094085aa0892c3c238d083
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Vatileaks 2?
editThere is a second Vatican leaks scandal 1. Should it be included in this article or should it have its own article? Thinker78 (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Person's name not clear
editIn the below sentence, it is not clear who Allen is.
According to Allen, none of the information leaked seemed "especially fatal".
Refer to the source at the end of the line (no. 4). Editrite! (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Continuity
editThe second paragraph of the lead starts with "Over following months", however, the first paragraph of the lead does ot include any time indicator, making these words meaningless. This should be fixed. Debresser (talk) 23:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)