Talk:Veda (company)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 14.203.126.218 in topic Company Rebranded as Equifax

Notes

edit

I have today been informed of the willful inaccuracies retained by Baycorp or Credit Advantage. The service provider made numerous conversations to correct a clients account and they simply did not listen and retained bad information.

They also advise the identites to approach issues in this manner on their website ( ie. asking service providers to contact them directly) -putting them out of the loop, then advising the service provider that the identity has the responsibility to write letters. This ensures nothing is resolved continually.

Would they resort to this to keep the information they've got regardless of accuracy and the harm it causes? Do they seem to think they would have no product to sell otherwise? Please advise of your experiences, here. I am considering a presentation to the Ombudsman of their industry. Don't be afraid speak. But speak clearly.

Credit Reference Association of Australia?

edit

I can't make out the history. The article says "The Company was previously known as Baycorp Advantage, which was a merger of Australian company Data Advantage and New Zealand Company Baycorp." But I also read that Baycorp Advantage was previously "Credit Reference Association of Australia."[1][2] --Chriswaterguy talk 16:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cardreport.com/international/australia.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 08:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Company Rebranded as Equifax

edit

https://www.equifax.com.au/rebrand Not sure what is necessary to update this page correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.203.126.218 (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply