Talk:Venceremos (political organization)

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

'Antiwar demonstrations that invariably erupted into violence' strikes me as a suspect way of putting things. Certainly antiwar demonstrations, even in the early 70s did not invariably erupt into violence, and when they did, as I understand it, it was as often as not a direct result of police activity. Or did whoever wrote it mean to say something about what Venveremos did in antiwar demonstrations? -- Rafaelgr, March 8 2004

Venceremos Organization merger.

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This entry duplicated the Venceremos Organization entry and the two articles should be merged. DJ Silverfish 18:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

There is some confusion here - this article discusses the VO, a breakaway group from the Bay Area Revolutionary Union. This is an entirely different group from the Venceremos Brigade, which is a group of supporters of Cuba who annually travel to that country to take place in work brigades. I've move the article from "Venceremos Brigade" to here. Peter G Werner 19:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

this wiki entry was not sourced and not terribly informative. i have tried to add some content but have been defeated by less-than-transparent wiki footnoting techniques. hope someone can tidy this up a bit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pottawatomie (talk • contribs) 17:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic