References

edit

I deleted the reference: http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/articles/11108231.html because it linked to page that did not mention V13. I did replace it with a page that covered the incident in question. jonathon (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reliable Source for footnote 5?

edit

How is "according to my daughter they are a relatively laid-back outfit in general, and prefer not to exert themselves" a reliable source? Not to mention the plagerism that just deleted the "according to my daughter" part? sheesh. Oh yeah, what some grieving mother's daughter had to say about the gang is a great way to characterize Venice 13. Sure, the one guy I knew was laid back, but heck, he was a junkie too. I realize that firsthand experience has no place on wikipedia but it does motiviate me to call bullshit.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Venice 13. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Venice 13. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply