Talk:Vergil (Devil May Cry)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Picking this up for a review now that I have some more time, and I would be interested in reading more about this character. Aoba47 (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

• I would be a little more specific in the ALT text for the infobox image, as you could technically apply to any image of any character from the video game series.
  • Done.
• I have a suggestion for this sentence (Vergil was originally conceptualized as Nelo Angelo—Dante's rival in terms of moves and appearance—in the 2001 game.). I think “portrayed” is a better word choice than “conceptualized”.
  • Done.

Creation and concept

• I would be more descriptive in the ALT text, as it could apply to any image of a video game character.
  • Done.
• I would combine these two sentences (Nelo Angelo was created as a rival for Dante; he was designed by Makoto Tsuchibayashi) to the following (Makoto Tsuchibayashi designed Nelo Angelo as a rival for Dante).
  • Done.
• For these two sentences (Ikeno stated that because Vergil and Dante are identical twins, they share a hairstyle in the opening of the game, which was intended to make new players confuse them. Vergil's clothing was intended to contrast with his brother's; similarly, Nelo Angelo's design was prominently blue while Dante's was red.), I would avoid using “intended” twice in close proximity.
  • Done
• For this sentence (Unlike other enemy demons from Devil May Cry, Nelo Angelo did not have original frameworks;), do you know if there is a way to wikilink “frameworks” to help an unfamilar reader?
  • Tried adding an easier concept.

Voice actors

• I would avoid having a two sentence paragraph if possible.
  • Done.

Characteristics

• Everything looks good here.

Appearances

• Unlink the games that were wikilinked in the previous section. I have noticed several instances of this.
  • Done.

Reception

• Unlink Project X Zone 2.
  • Done.

Final comments

• Wonderful work with the article. I could not find that many issues with it (at least for the level of a GA). Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 23:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Thanks for the review. I tried fixing all the issues you pointed. Also, I gotta thank Flowerpiep for helping me with a minor copyedit.Tintor2 (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you for addressing everything. I will ✓ Pass this. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate either an image or source review for my current FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 00:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.