Talk:Verified Carbon Standard
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
References & promotional tone
editThere are "Verified+Carbon+Standard"&oq=&gs_l= lots of mentions in the media, but these don't constitute notability by themselves. Are there any news articles or other notable sources which are primarily about VCS?
It seems like this is an important topic which probably satisfies WP:Notability, but it needs better references. I've added links to an FAO and a UK govt document for the interim - not sure if they meet the criteria, but at least they're not self-promotion.
It still has a promotional tone, but I removed the section which seemed least justified/supported, about the CEO. --Chriswaterguy talk 00:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Cleaned this up a little bit with sources, also reflecting renaming of organization to Verra. Cheerful word nerd (talk) 20:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Adding some more information on Guardian report. — comment added by Cathywiki76 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Bulked up on available public comments on offsets and markets. WikiEditor8910 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Divergence of standard and organization names
editThe standard is now still VCS, while the organization is named Verra. I worked on this some, but could probably be made even clearer. I think VCS the standard is still more notable than the Verra organization -- not sure if necessitates a separate entry for Verra yet. Cheerful word nerd (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- I did do some minor edits to attempt the separation from the 'standard' and Verra the organization. Netforcarbon (talk) 02:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
blank-and-redirect from Verified Carbon Standard
editmade a blank-and-redirect from Verified Carbon Standard Cheerful word nerd (talk) 20:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Guardian: Shell to spend $450m on carbon offsetting as fears grow that credits may be worthless
editSemi-protected edit request on 20 January 2023
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following sentence with citation to the last line of the second paragraph above History section. "However, these findings are disputed by Verra and other actors in the marketplace." with the following source cited: [1] Cathywiki76 (talk) 11:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. You'll need to find secondary sources discussing this. This is essentially a blog piece published by a company. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
