Talk:Vermont Senate
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Vermont Senate districts, 2012–2022 page were merged into Vermont Senate on 17 February 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Progressive need shade of blue?
editI would suggest here, as in the house, progressives need a shade of blue. I suspect that they seldom caucus with Republicans, but probably often enough with Democrats. Student7 (talk) 00:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Which voting system?
editThe article doesn't state which voting system is used to elect the multi-member districts? Does the elector vote for more than one candidate (which would be bloc voting or limited voting) or does she vote for only one (which would be the SNTV method)?
- A voter may "bullet-ballot" by voting for only one candidate when s/he is eligible to vote for two. Or the voter may vote for two. I don't have a reference. These are in politically cohesive areas where they have historically wanted to vote for all candidates in that area to represent everybody and they are not particular about what town they come from, even if it's not their town. Student7 (talk) 00:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
File:VSHSenate14.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:VSHSenate14.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |