Talk:Vernian Process

Traditionally, when attributing a cover, one credits the band who wrote and recorded the song, rather than another band who covered it previously. 'Bela Lugosi's Dead' was a Bauhaus song, released in '78 or '79. Nouvelle Vague became one of many bands to cover it almost 30 years later in 2006. Is there some way in which the Vernian Process version owes ancestry to the Nouvelle Vague version? If so, I'd suggest a formulation like "A remix of Bauhaus's 'Bela Lugosi's Dead,' which sampled heavily from Nouvelle Vague's cover of the song" or "A remix of the Nouvelle Vague cover of 'Bela Lugosi's Dead' (originally by Bauhaus)" 67.171.38.172 (talk) 00:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

The remix in question was of a version recorded by Nouvelle Vague which was drastically different from the original. It wasn't a remix of Bauhaus, because it contained none of the elements of the original, other than the bass riff. FACT50 (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vernian Process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928061702/http://www.mickmercer.com/pdfs/the_mick_30.pdf to http://www.mickmercer.com/pdfs/the_mick_30.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vernian Process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315212918/http://www.sepiachord.com/vp121906.htm to http://www.sepiachord.com/vp121906.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080624051255/http://etheremporium.pbwiki.com/Vernian%20Process to http://etheremporium.pbwiki.com/Vernian%20Process

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)