Talk:Vespasian's Camp

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Bad grammar

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bad grammar is in places. See slate mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.162.31 (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cheeky little ce, a few typos, added convert for metric-imperial comparison, auto-ed, dupe wikilink check. Rv as desired. Keith-264 (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sources

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have started moving the references to Harv and will finish tomorrow. I don't think that The Megalithic Portal is a RS in Wikipedia terms; we need to look to resource that material. Note the Sources towards the bottom of cite 2. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:58, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic