Talk:Vibecession
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Remusofreem in topic Article is Unbalanced
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Political Propaganda
editWikipedia is a shameful place. Truly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.191.15.34 (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Article is Unbalanced
editThis article has several issues:
- For one, vibecession seems unlikely to comprise a meaningful part of historical analyses of this moment a decade from now. This analysis smacks of recency bias and only provides one example: that of the current moment.
- For two the article is unbalanced and neglects other analyses from different POV (See here) that might argue that for example the perspective that the economy is weak is a reflection of a section of the population that is *actually* not doing well while other sectors are doing great.
Remusofreem (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- agree. this should be deleted. The author page even redirects here. No relevance at all. This should be no more than a note (with opposing views) in a larger article about the political issue it is contextualized. Gcbwiki (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- "balance" is not a rationale for deletion, but by all means go to AfD. --Meerhawk (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think the bigger concern has been notability, not balance. Balance of an article can be fixed through editing. The fact that the topic of this article is not notable cannot be fixed through editing Remusofreem (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)