Talk:Vibecession
Latest comment: 18 days ago by 98.191.15.34 in topic Political Propaganda
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Political Propaganda
editWikipedia is a shameful place. Truly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.191.15.34 (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Article is Unbalanced
editThis article has several issues:
- For one, vibecession seems unlikely to comprise a meaningful part of historical analyses of this moment a decade from now. This analysis smacks of recency bias and only provides one example: that of the current moment.
- For two the article is unbalanced and neglects other analyses from different POV (See here) that might argue that for example the perspective that the economy is weak is a reflection of a section of the population that is *actually* not doing well while other sectors are doing great.
Remusofreem (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- agree. this should be deleted. The author page even redirects here. No relevance at all. This should be no more than a note (with opposing views) in a larger article about the political issue it is contextualized. Gcbwiki (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)