This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Despite being deprecated by Wikipedia, I chose to use a Daily Caller link to back up the impact of joebiden.info. There are other references but I feel it was important, in balance, to include. tedder (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
The Daily Caller deprecation RFC says: There is an overwhelming majority, arguments and all, for option 4: Publishes false or fabricated information, and should be deprecated as in the 2017 RfC of the Daily Mail. The 2017 Daily Mail RFC says: its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited. This is a strong general consensus, which would be difficult to reasonably override with WP:LOCALCONSENSUS.
