Talk:Vicky Kaushal/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ssven2 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 04:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
I will review this article, thank you. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 04:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comments
- "Aspiring to a career in films" — Can be rephrased as "Aspiring to take up a career in film".
- "His father was keen on his son having a stable career" — As an engineer or any other position in the film industry.
- Most likely as an engineer, but the source doesn't explicitly mention it. I therefore wrote that he "thus pursued an engineering degree" later in the sentence. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Does any source mention Laal Pencil's genre?
- Nope, couldn't find any mention of it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps a wikilink to "stammering" in case readers don't quite get the meaning at first.
- Ssven2, thanks for the comments. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Sources
- Wikilink the publishers/newspapers/websites for ref nos 1 to 7.
- NDTV, Rediff.com, Box Office India, Film Companion, RajeevMasand.com shouldn't be in italics.
- Wikilink the publishers/newspapers/websites for ref nos 10, 11 and 12.
- Wikilink NDTV and The Hindu in ref nos 15 and 16 respectively.
- Wikilink Variety in ref no 20.
- Remove the wikilink for ref no 24 (Firspost) coz there are other Firstpost references before it.
- Wikilink Business Standard, India Today, Bollywood Hungama, Mid Day
- Remove the wikilink for ref no 30 (NDTV) coz there are other NDTV references before it.
- Remove the wikilink for ref no 38 (Filmfare) coz there are other Filmfare references before it.
That's about it from me. Resolve the remaining comments and the article is passed. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ssven2, all done. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Thank you for addressing my comments, Krimuk2.0. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)