This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Victimisation is not only about employment law
editOK ?--Penbat (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Congratulations for pointing that out! You're not the person adding the tonne of random ideas, though are you? I think that if you've got psychology material, that'd be really useful to put that in; good of you to create a separate section for law. Wikidea 18:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will what i can. I do have a fair library of useful psychology material. However i do notice that there is a big Victimisation section here Victimology#Victimization but it seems mainly crime orientated and not very useful, although really ought to be merged with this article. --Penbat (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Pending adding an expanded page later for peer victimisation --
- Thanks. I will what i can. I do have a fair library of useful psychology material. However i do notice that there is a big Victimisation section here Victimology#Victimization but it seems mainly crime orientated and not very useful, although really ought to be merged with this article. --Penbat (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
revictimisation
editi can see how revictimisation differs from secondary victimization however the mechanism behind revictimsation needs explaining and seems mysterious. It also applies to abuse in general not just sexual abuse for example children bullied at school often get bullied as adults as well.--Penbat (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Image removed
editI've removed this image: [1] It's pretty unclear, and even when you work out what it is, it's not really relevant - it only has a tenuous and metaphorical link with the subject of this article. Robofish (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
[copy of article section removed by Guttitto (talk) 22:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)]