 | Victor N. J. Jones has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 9, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Victor N. J. Jones/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 22:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 07:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Generalissima. I will be reviewing this article. Alexeyevitch(talk) 07:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- (optional) Prehaps this can be reworded.
On April 21, 1900, Victor Noble Jarrott Jones was born in Exeter, Ontario, Canada
- (optional) Prehaps this can be reworded.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
Question: who are the authors that work for Docomomo, and what makes it a reliable source?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Alexeyevitch Docomomo is an architectural preservation and study organization. Its Western Washington chapter articles write are usually written by Michael Houser, who works as the architectural historian of Washington state. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- OK, all other sources including this is a thumbs up from me. Alexeyevitch(talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Alexeyevitch Docomomo is an architectural preservation and study organization. Its Western Washington chapter articles write are usually written by Michael Houser, who works as the architectural historian of Washington state. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- C. It contains no original research:
- No OR.
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- No issues here.
- C. It contains no original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- No issues, pass.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.