Talk:Victoria, Princess Royal

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Victoria, Princess Royal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110905012459/http://www.barnardf.demon.co.uk/Letters/EmpressF.htm to http://www.barnardf.demon.co.uk/Letters/EmpressF.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Victoria, Crown Princess of Prussia.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Artist

She may be an accomplished amateur, that does not mean she is notable as an artist. Such does not belong in such categories. They are non-defining. DrKay (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

She is a notable German artist. She received classes from two notable painters. She devoted much of her later life to painting. Her paintings if sold would be worth a great deal of money. This is more than enough. Most artists are amateurs; that has never been part of the definition of artist on wikipedia. Being paid or not is not a factor. She must be part of the category 19th-century German women artists. Helpfulwikieditoryay (talk) 21:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Read CAREFULLY what Kay stated. NOTABLE. She most certainly is NOT notable as an artist. Her paintings would sell for a high price because of her history as a German royal. If Biden doodled and decided to sell it, that too would go for $$ due to who he is, not because he has the slightest talent as an artist or a competent president. Her amateur dabblings in art are only found in biographies, not in the world of art. Agree with the removal. HammerFilmFan (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

"Draft:Victoria Adelaide Mary Louisa" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Draft:Victoria Adelaide Mary Louisa has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 29 § Draft:Victoria Adelaide Mary Louisa until a consensus is reached. Keivan.f^Talk 03:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)