Talk:Video game localization

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Video game localization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060220042945/http://cmpevents.com:80/GD06/a.asp?option=C to https://www.cmpevents.com/gd06/a.asp?option=C&V=1&SB=4&AdS=0&DLnts=1&scTKs=0&scFMTs=0&GetDaysC=0&SPids=0&CP1=100&scTKs1=0&scFMTs1=0&scLVs=0&GetDaysC1=0
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141230204418/http://www.robertsonlanguages.co.uk/localisation/games/ to http://www.robertsonlanguages.co.uk/localisation/games

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

More details needed

I wish we had more pictures and political background here a la e.g. http://www.dorkly.com/post/80945/germany-censorship Zezen (talk) 08:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Issue resoved?

I plan to edit more but i hope that i have done enough so far that it can be reviewed. thanks SenorMcChum (talk) 04:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

have completed my edits as far as I am fine with, will take a final look back later on. SenorMcChum (talk) 05:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Grammar & Tone Issues

Made a small edit to this article for a class assignment, but seeing this article full of errors is disappointing. I plan on coming back within a few weeks to do a more thorough homogenization of tone and grammar, but I'm leavin' this comment 'ere to bring some activity back to this article in case anybody else gets to it first.

There are also a lot of old citations in this article. Would like to see if we can cite some more modern sources. がりょう (talk) 04:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)