Talk:View-source URI scheme

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

I am disputing the presence of the notability tag, as the subject appears to me to be an important and well-used feature of the internet. It also has several references dealing with it, proving that it is a subject of some weight.

If nobody objects within a reasonable period of time, I am removing the tag from the article. Shirudo (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


Firefox 47+

edit

I believe the mentioning of discontinuation for "Mozilla Firefox from version 47" is incorrect or at least incomplete. According to the dev notes[1] and bug entry[2], view-source is only no longer accessible from a web page (i.e. link tag or script). It is still accessible through standard UI "View Page Source" and also by manually typing/pasting the link. Bishop2067 (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on View-source URI scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply