Talk:ViewSonic

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion:

advert, not exactly neutral either ping 08:42, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Bad grammar, bad spelling, POV, ad. Four strikes against it. Rick K 08:53, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. -Plop 14:50, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)
Delete Bensaccount 15:23, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
~~Delete~~. Advert, no reason given that it will ever become an article. Andrewa 17:14, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Nonsense, Andrew. ViewSonic is a well-known company; we have articles about all manner of different companies and this is no different. Definitely keep. Darkcore 21:19, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Now an acceptable stub. Good work. Andrewa 07:04, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
If this is a real company, keep Ensiform 04:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Revised entry is appropriate. Cribcage 06:51, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- agreed, keep the new version ping 08:00, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
This is a real company. New version seems fine; keep. —Psychonaut 15:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Large well-known company. -- Zigger 17:57, 2004 Apr 16 (UTC)
Keep. 3m hits can't be wrong. BL 07:38, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Scurra 16:46, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Forbes article in Reference section of ViewSonic page should be changed

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reference section links to an outdated article on Forbes.com. The Associated Press has since issued a correction. The corrected version can be found here: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/02/ap3879649.html

This version CORRECTS that company earned $3.97 million in latest quarter instead of losing about $4 million. 12.33.144.99 17:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ViewSonic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081209090630/http://press.nokia.com:80/PR/200001/775025_5.html to http://press.nokia.com/PR/200001/775025_5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic