Talk:Viktor Kozin

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Improving the article

edit

This inventor biography and the related article Resonance method of ice destruction about the invention both seem to be important and noticable, since the idea of invention is really interesting, the method has been already tested and used, and the inventor indeed received many patents and awards fo his invention. However the article is written in bad English, intro doesn't follow general lines, and all those long lists of patents and works seem to be excessive in encyclopedia, especially in the present expanded form. My suggestion is to cut them off, and leave only the most important works and patents. And of course, the intro, the biography and the part on inventions should be re-written in a better style and format. GreyHood Talk 20:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:225px-Kozin Victor.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:225px-Kozin Victor.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Viktor Kozin.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Viktor Kozin.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Viktor Kozin.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Viktor Kozin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply