Wikipedia

Talk:Vildanden (airline)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleVildanden (airline) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 6, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 5, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the airline Vildanden started its first route with wet leased aircraft (example pictured) from Coast Air?

Fair use rationale for Image:Vildanden Logo.png

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Vildanden Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vildanden (airline)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: warrior4321 14:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


Prose

edit
  • it flies to Bergen and Stavanger a Jetstream 32 and a ATR 42, wet leased from Danish Air Transport (DAT) and Helitrans.
Vildanden flies to Bergen and Stavanger using a Jetstream 32 and ATR 42 which are wet leased from the Danish Air Transport (DAT) and Helitrans.

References

edit
  • None of your references are in English. You should provide most of your references in English, with a handful in Norwegian.

Images

edit

File:Vildanden 340.png has image sourcing issues. Please upload an alternative image or fix the sourcing issues with the current image.

Overall, the article is a great read and well written. Please fix these issues, and the article should be passed soon. Thanks -- warrior4321 14:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comment from another editor.

WP:V states "Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources should be used in preference to non-English ones, except where no English source of equal quality can be found that contains the relevant material." If there are no English-language sources for the info, then the Norwegian refs are OK. Arsenikk, have you looked for English sources on the material? Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the review. The prose thing has been fixed up. Regarding the Norwegian sources, please see the note from Hamiltonstone above: this is a local airline with, as far as I have able to see, no coverage from English-language sources at all. Nearly all the information here is referenced from the two local newspapers Varden and Telemarksavisa (supplemented by the county office of the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation). Almost all the information here is not even available in national newspapers, and I don't think anything has reached an international audience. I always use English sources instead of Norwegian ones when they are available. Think of it this way: this article is the most comprehensive text available anywere in the world about Vildanden in a non-Norwegian language. That is the beauty of Wikipedia :)
As for File:Vildanden 340.png, I do not understand what is wrong with the licensing. It is uploaded by User:KS-U92 on the Commons, stating "own work" and licensing it under GDFL and CC-BY-AS-3.0, which he, as photographer, is fully in his right to do. Arsenikk (talk) 09:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Note: the image is up for deletion; in the "source" section, it says "own work". Airplaneman ✈ 22:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
That nomination was initiated by Warrior4321, that is why I am asking him for the rationale. "Own work" is what it is supposed to say if you take the image yourself and upload it, see for instance my last upload (File:Cockpit of 737-300 LN-KKU.jpg). Also, we cannot delete Commons images on Wikipedia; they have to be deleted there. Arsenikk (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the deletion nomination since it is moot on wikipedia. However I do not understand the rationale for wanting the image deleted. There is a perfectly fine source and the uploader seems to be a editor in good standing on commons. The image is fine. Rettetast (talk) 09:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Excellent, I have passed the article.
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on Vildanden (airline). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vildanden_(airline)&oldid=1207274415"