This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
because it is the absolutely best reference on this matter. I will try to add another reference as well. I don't understand why you claim that is an "anti-Lithuanian POV" website. In my understanding, it is very much a "pro-Lithuanian" website focused on bringing attention to falsifiers of Lithuanian history. However, even if it was "anti-Lithuanian", I don't see why that would be relevant so long as it is an important reference for this particular issue. AndriusKulikauskas (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC) All the more so, given that this is the "Controversy" section, there should be more room for a variety of points of view. Furthermore, this is a source in English. The other source is excellent, too. AndriusKulikauskas (talk) 07:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@AndriusKulikauskas: First of all, that website tries everything to discredit Lithuania, its citizens, history, etc. Secondly, you are on of the main contributors there so any reference from that website breaks the WP:SELFPUBLISH policy. Please get familiar with Wikipedia policies/guidelines before you continue to make more edits. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Sabbatino: Thank you, Sabbatino, for replying. I checked the Wikipedia policy you cite and I explain to you that I am not the author of the page I cite. The author is Defending History editor Dovid Katz, who is "an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." In what way does the cited page discredit Lithuania, its citizens and history? I personally find it strange that you, as an anonymous contributor to Wikipedia, seek to discredit me, a nonanonymous person, based not on what I have done, but where I participate. If you would like us to understand each other better, we could exchange emails or talk by phone. AndriusKulikauskas (talk) 12:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
